Calls for Transparency in Chief Justice Removal Proceedings Gain Momentum

Franklin Cudjoe Advocates for Public Access to Judicial Process

Transparency in judicial processes is crucial to maintaining public trust in Ghana’s legal system. The ongoing proceedings regarding the potential removal of the Chief Justice have sparked widespread debate, with legal experts and civil society groups calling for more openness. Among them, IMANI Africa’s President, Franklin Cudjoe, has strongly advocated for public access to these proceedings, emphasizing the importance of clarity and accountability.

The Case for Transparency

Growing Concerns Over Confidentiality

In recent weeks, concerns have emerged regarding the secrecy surrounding the removal process. Documents and crucial materials have been handled behind closed doors, raising questions about fairness and public trust.

Speaking on Channel One TV’s Big Issue on March 29, 2025, Franklin Cudjoe called for greater transparency, stating:

“I do believe we should hear the reasons. We should know exactly what is happening. The idea of in-camera sittings makes the process seem overly inquisitorial, and I don’t think that’s right.”

Constitutional Constraints vs. Public Interest

While Ghana’s constitution provides for confidentiality in certain judicial matters, Cudjoe argues that the removal of the Chief Justice is of national importance and should not be shrouded in secrecy. He suggests that making these proceedings public would enhance the credibility of the judiciary and ensure justice is served openly.

Why Public Disclosure Matters

Upholding Judicial Integrity

The judiciary is a pillar of democracy, and any process that involves the potential removal of the Chief Justice must be handled with the highest levels of integrity. Keeping the proceedings open to the public would:

• Prevent political interference.
• Enhance judicial accountability.
• Build confidence in the legal system.

Global Best Practices

Several democratic nations maintain a transparent process when handling similar judicial matters. For example, in the United States, judicial impeachment hearings are conducted publicly, allowing citizens to follow the process and form informed opinions.

The Way Forward

Advocating for Legal Reforms

To ensure lasting change, legal experts and civil society groups like IMANI Africa are pushing for amendments to judicial procedures that promote greater transparency.

Key reforms could include:

• Mandatory public disclosure of proceedings involving judicial removals.
• Regular updates from the Judicial Council to keep the public informed.
• Independent monitoring committees to oversee judicial accountability.

Final Thoughts

Franklin Cudjoe’s call for transparency resonates with a broader demand for accountability and openness in Ghana’s governance structures. As the debate continues, it is crucial for stakeholders—including lawmakers, civil society organizations, and the media—to push for judicial transparency that aligns with global best practices.